Showing posts with label latest Heinrich van Rooyen. Show all posts
Showing posts with label latest Heinrich van Rooyen. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 1, 2019

The Modus Operandi of the Trial of Heinrich van Rooyen

Adv. Terry Price 
For reasons which become obvious by going through the court records and the letters from Lunen Meyer to Mr van Rooyen during the investigation and the trial, Lunen Meyer persuaded and coerced Mr van Rooyen Snr to postpone the case so that Adv Van Der Vyver could be available for the trial, knowing that Trollip and his henchmen had worked hard to tamper with evidence in the Inge Lotz case in Cape Town in which Adv Van Der Vyver prosecuted and lost the case.   The same modus operandi took place in Heinrich van Rooyen’s trial and it is remiss that the defense team of Adv Terry Price lost the case, as the defense team won the Inge Lotz case and the accused walked free.  Heini’s trial was a travesty of justice created by all those involved in the investigation and the trial.  The trial judge, Adv, N Erasmus was biased and unreasonable - another human rights abuse.  Too much emphasis was also placed on the fact that Heini danced, went out with and was friendly with white girls, causing the trial to have an undertone of racism. This too is a human rights abuse. 

Tuesday, December 18, 2018

Corruption on the Knysna Lagoon

I have a small group on FaceBook that contains an  amazing group of detectives - lawyers, forensic scientists, detectives, private investigators and this is just some of the irregularities we have found that went down during the investigation and trial of Heinrich van Rooyen. 
Halfway through the trail, the assessor (Charles Erasmus) took Judge Nathan Erasmus, Director Trollip of the SAPS Investigating Officer, Lunen Meyer (defense attorney), Terry Price (defense advocate) and Ella Smook (journalist from CPT- working for IOL on a boat trip!!!! We have traced all the people - brilliant work. Thank you, so much to our hard workers. The journalist wrote in the news what had not taken place in court yet. It is absolutely criminal for such a thing to have happened during a trail. It is just one of the things I am going to be making an affidavit for so that the Judicial Conduct Committee of the Office of Chief Justice can look at it. Just waiting for Mr van Rooyen Snr & Franklin van Rooyen's affidavits. 
The second thing that I am going to ask them to investigate is the biased way in which the judge behaved and also that he continually said he would tell the accused later why he was making certain decisions or that he would include it in his summing up - but he never did. He refused leave to appeal because he said that no other court would find a different verdict to his.  Is that his reason?  That he is the most brilliant legal mind in the country?  I think not.