Showing posts with label Attie Trollip. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Attie Trollip. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 1, 2019

The Modus Operandi of the Trial of Heinrich van Rooyen

Adv. Terry Price 
For reasons which become obvious by going through the court records and the letters from Lunen Meyer to Mr van Rooyen during the investigation and the trial, Lunen Meyer persuaded and coerced Mr van Rooyen Snr to postpone the case so that Adv Van Der Vyver could be available for the trial, knowing that Trollip and his henchmen had worked hard to tamper with evidence in the Inge Lotz case in Cape Town in which Adv Van Der Vyver prosecuted and lost the case.   The same modus operandi took place in Heinrich van Rooyen’s trial and it is remiss that the defense team of Adv Terry Price lost the case, as the defense team won the Inge Lotz case and the accused walked free.  Heini’s trial was a travesty of justice created by all those involved in the investigation and the trial.  The trial judge, Adv, N Erasmus was biased and unreasonable - another human rights abuse.  Too much emphasis was also placed on the fact that Heini danced, went out with and was friendly with white girls, causing the trial to have an undertone of racism. This too is a human rights abuse. 

Thursday, December 6, 2018

Fred van der Vyver vs Heinrich van Rooyen


Investigating Officer Director Attie Trollip (unfortunately dead otherwise …) and Adv Christenus van der Vijver prosecuted Fred van der Vyver in the Inge Lotz murder and lost because Fred’s defense team could show that the forensic evidence had been tampered with to ensure that Fred was found guilty.   Fred was found innocent.   They had to save face, so a week later, when they prosecuted Heinrich van Rooyen’s case, the same two, Director Trollip and Christenus van der Vijver fabricated and tampered with evidence because they HAD to find him guilty.  Unfortunately, the Judge (Nathan Erasmus) also allowed evidence which was glaringly incorrect to be ignored and Price, his defense, did the worst job possible – completely ignoring glaringly obvious forensic contamination and fabrication and accepting the state’s evidence without asking a single question when it was most important.   Any first-year law student could have done a better job.   The real difference between the two cases was money!

Sunday, October 28, 2018

Latest on the Inge Lotz Murder


Latest 


Inge Lotz – Latest (2018)
____________________________________________________________________________

On Saturday morning 27 October 2018, Thomas Mollett held a Talk at the Library in Paarl. The subject was the murders of Inge Lotz, Reeva Steenkamp, Anni Dewani and the recent “Axe Murders” (Henri van Breda). Unlike some of his previous talks the once 200 audience was reduced to a mere 32 persons, 7 being members of the local police.

At his last meeting months ago in Milnerton, Thomas spoke of an “injury” that Inge had on her left hip. He added that it was in the form of an arrow. At the time of her death, at the autopsy and even over the past 13 years, no-one made any mention of the arrow “injury”. It is in fact a cut so thin and precise, probably a scalpel was used to cut the perfect arrow which points downwards towards her genitals. How did Thomas suddenly become aware of this so-called “injury” – as he plays down the gory message left on her mutilated body by one of the killers?

This was one of the reasons I attended the Paarl Talk, to ask that question and a second. The other question was to ask Thomas to explain how Inge’s “To Do” list she wrote on the day of her murder, had changed from the original when it appeared on his 2014 Truth4Inge site and changed again in his 2015 book “Bloody Lies Too.” This is nothing less than defeating the ends of justice – on a document that should have been handed to the police.

Thomas started the talk with Inge’s murder and an hour later, was still drivelling on about Fred’s fingerprints on Folien#1, which the police claimed came off a DVD cover Inge had rented the afternoon of her death. In court the fingerprint evidence was trashed by the defence and shown to have probably been deliberate fabrication of evidence. Late Director Attie Trollip was the police overall co-ordinator in the murder investigation.

From the audience, Schalk Burger senior (SA rugby legend), asked Thomas to stop misleading the audience and to concentrate on real issues in the murder, like the role played by Director Trollip behind the scenes. Thomas lost his composure and resorted to his well-known cocky attitude which had Schalk tell him just to get past the nonsense and talk some sense.

Thomas was clearly flustered and turned his attention to me in the opposite back corner. He pointed at me and said “Mr Elsdon” he shouted, “Why did you not Email your intention to be present and request a seat? Because ... you are not welcome here!” This drew a few piercing glares from some present, probably mostly those from “rent a crowd.”

Schalk stood up, as big a man I’ve ever seen and warned Thomas not to become personal in a public library forum. He challenged Thomas to try and book a seat at his own meeting using the Information site of Piquette Books. Schalk said trying to book a ticket was a hopeless exercise and waste of time.

Thomas ignored the challenge and looking at me and waving his hand to the door shouted, “Out ... out ... you are not welcome!” I asked him why he waited until then when he could have asked me to leave before he started his talk. Keeping the attention on me, Thomas told the audience, “He (Elsdon) has written a book that nobody wants to buy ... because it is not based on proven science.”

By then Schalk had had enough and told Thomas he thought he was coming to learn something scientific about the murders. Instead all he had heard was a load of nonsense from someone who cannot control his emotions. With that, Schalk stood up and left the room.

Thomas pointed at me again and yelled. “Out ... out ... now!” Just then the lady managing the presentation pushed a button. On the overhead, the magazine with a few drops of blood that lay across Inge’s feet when her body was found, appeared.

“Wait ... wait ... Mr Elsdon,” Thomas called, “How many drops of blood are there on these two pages.” After I thanked Thomas for allowing me to stay a few more seconds, I told him that whether it was three or four drops made no difference. What was important, is that they were drops ... not spatter, as one would have expected to find a metre away from the nearest wound (unless the “crime scene” was staged!).

Thomas shouted his last “Out” and I stood up at the same time pulling a copy of my book “Broken & Betrayed” from a plastic packet. I stood up and held it in the air for the audience to see and said, “Read this if you want to know the truth, Broken and Betrayed – Inge Lotz.”

Showing signs of an imminent heart attack, Thomas shouted, “Don’t you use my platform to advertise your book!” With that, Thomas came charging towards me like a mad bull. I sheathed the book just as he stopped within sweat-smelling distance from me. All I said to him very calmly was, “Don’t touch me ... DON’T touch me.” With that I walked to the door where I stopped, turned around and said, “Good Luck”, before I walked out the room.

At the exit, I saw Schalk who, when he saw me, just shook his head. We shared introductions and went to a nearby coffee shop. There we had an interesting chat for more than an hour. At the same time Thomas was completing what he is paid to tell the world ... the lie that Fred van der Vyver alone murdered Inge Lotz. This of course is calculated to HIDE the truth, that Inge was murdered by persons very close to her ... because she was going to expose their dark secrets, also, the horrors of her young life.

At a guess this will probably be Thomas’ last public Talk ... the Paarl Talk was reduced to free entrance, as were the drinks, snacks and his books – unless he pays the audience to attend his next Talk. The DPP probably will refuse my pending request to reopen the Lotz murder – despite massive new factual evidence to show a police cover-up, including four new suspects who lack in alibis, cellphone activity and other areas, the day Inge was murdered.

Submitted by Alan D Elsdon



Friday, September 21, 2018

Heinrich van Rooyen - Botched Evidence in Trial

Taken from Alan Elsdon's book, Broken and Betrayed:
Four days after Victoria Stadler went missing, Director Trollip in Cape Town made himself available. Four days later, on Tuesday 15 November 2005, the partly decomposed body of Victoria was found in the Noetzie bushes on the outskirts of Knysna. After Trollip was contacted, he instructed forensic expert Supt Johannes to assist. This is the same FSL expert who assisted Capt Bruce in the Inge Lotz murder (where Fred, her boyfriend) was acquitted). Trollip then went to Knysna where he became the overall coordinator in Jessica and Victoria’s murder investigations. On Thursday 17 November, Heinrich van Rooyen, a local JD was arrested as a suspect in both murders. On Instruction from Trollip, Heinie’s blood was drawn “for DNA testing’. On Saturday 19 November, 20065, Heinie was released.
Also on Saturday 19 November 2005, four days after many thorough searches of the area by local and other Eastern Cape officers, including the canine unit, the police “found’ Victorias pants and underwear in the Noetzie bushes, only three meters from where her body had been found.
My conclusion: What kind of police work is this? How come they took four days to find clothing belonging to Victoria lying only 3 meters from where her body was found? Planted by the cops?? Planted by Attie Trollip? And why did the defense not follow up this very vital piece of evidence in the trial?

Information is taken 
from Alan Elsdon's book, Broken and Betrayed:

Tuesday, September 18, 2018

Some of the sloppy Evidence in Heinrich van Rooyen's trial

Taken from Alan Elsdon's book, Broken and Betrayed:
Four days after Victoria Stadler went missing, Director Trollip in Cape Town made himself available. Four days later, on Tuesday 15 November 2005, the partly decomposed body of Victoria was found in the Noetzie bushes on the outskirts of Knysna. After Trollip was contacted, he instructed forensic expert Supt Johannes to assist. This is the same FSL expert who assisted Capt Bruce in the Inge Lotz murder (where Fred, her boyfriend) was acquitted). Trollip then went to Knysna where he became the overall coordinator in Jessica and Victoria’s murder investigations. On Thursday 17 November, Heinrich van Rooyen, a local JD was arrested as a suspect in both murders. On Instruction from Trollip, Heinie’s blood was drawn “for DNA testing’. On Saturday 19 November, 20065, Heinie was released.
Also on Saturday 19 November 2005, four days after many thorough searches of the area by local and other Eastern Cape officers, including the canine unit, the police “found’ Victorias pants and underwear in the Noetzie bushes, only three meters from where her body had been found.
My conclusion: What kind of police work is this? How come they took four days to find clothing belonging to Victoria lying only 3 meters from where her body was found? Planted by the cops?? Planted by Attie Trollip? And why did the defense not follow up this very vital piece of evidence in the trial?