Showing posts with label South Africa. Show all posts
Showing posts with label South Africa. Show all posts

Monday, May 22, 2017

Knowing the Truth, Seeing the Truth but still Believing the Lies



White consciousness should have the following aims:
·        To crystallise the needs and aspirations of the whites and to make known their grievances.
·        Where possible to put into effect programs designed to meet the needs of whites and to act on a collective basis in an effort to solve some of the problems which beset them.
·        To heighten the degree of contact not only amongst the white but also amongst these and the rest of the South African population to make the whites accepted on their own terms as an integral part of the South African community.
·        To establish a solid identity amongst whites and to ensure that they are always treated with the dignity and respect they deserve.
·        To boost up the morale of the whites to heighten their own confidence in themselves and to contribute largely to the direction of thought taken by various institutions on social, political and other current topics.
While these aims might appear to be couched in radicalistic language, they are in fact a sign that the white community has at last lost faith with their black counterparts and is now withdrawing from the open society.   The whites are tired of standing at the touchlines to witness a game that they should be playing.  They want to do things for themselves and all by themselves.
A time has come when whites have to formulate their own thinking, unpolluted by ideas emanating from a group with lots at stake in the status quo.  It is difficult not to look at black society as a group of people bent on perpetuating that status quo.  All suffer from the same fault basically of accepting as a fact that there shall be black leadership and even worse, that they shall occupy themselves predominantly with problems affecting black society first.   We need to adopt the principle that whites should work themselves into a powerful group so as to go forth and stake their rightful claim in the open society rather than to exercise that power in some obscure part of the Kalahari.
It is a painful waste of time to engage in any dialogue with racially-bigoted organisations.  Hence, this belies the belief that our withdrawal is an end in itself. 
(Written by Steve Biko in 1970.  I only inserted the word “white’ where he had written ‘black’. But so apt for where we find ourselves today – a group with no identity) 

Friday, March 17, 2017

Human Rights Day

I am not a racist.  I am a human rights activist and speak out for those who can’t speak for themselves or are too afraid to stand up for themselves.  Whites are afraid.  
We have on Tuesday, THE SICK JOKE OF HUMAN RIGHTS DAY - Whose human rights?  This is a commie government so individual human rights mean zero … For them it is the rights of the majority only.   Where are the human rights in a country that has race-based laws against the minority?   Where are the human rights when we have innocent people in prison and the criminals on the streets?  Where are the human rights when our politicians want to take away land without compensation from whites?  Where are the human rights of the prisoners who live in appalling conditions?  Where are the human rights for those who need their government grants?   Where are the human rights when jobs are linked to the colour of your skin?  Instead of celebrating human rights on Tuesday, we would be better off making plans to eliminate the genocidal conditions that this government is fostering so that we can LIVE IN PEACE IN THE LAND OF OUR BIRTH.   

Friday, January 6, 2017

Wrapping a Fire with Paper

Last week, a minister of religion (excuse the lack of capital letters) came to see me at home.  I don’t use capital letters for things I have no respect for.  He is a staunch ANC supporter.  I had The Long March and Mao’s Great Famine on my bed.  He showed interest and asked to borrow one.  I asked him if he knew that the SACP were pulling the strings of the ANC.  “I am a communist”, he responded.  I was gobsmacked.  “Then you are not a minister because God and communism are mutually exclusive”, I said. “The leader is worshiped, not some invisible being”. His argument with me was based on lack of knowledge.  I lent him the book although in retrospect I am sorry I did that.  I hope it is returned.
For years I have been studying the Soviet Union’s history of communism in an attempt to understand how communism fits into South Africa. My bookshelves are filled with books on communism and my head contains more than the sum total of those books. 
Twenty-two years down the line from “Freedom”, we are importing the Chinese like there is no tomorrow.  Our mineral rights are being sold to them  – our language has many Russian/Communist words and terms used.  Our president wants our children to learn Mandarin. We have comrades, commissars and parastatals amongst other terms.  Do our government officials even know what a commissar was in Russia?  Commissars were nothing more than impimpi’s.  The communists in our country are going to turn our land into a land of whisperers, where everyone will be too afraid to say anything. 
Our Generals of the SADF could have taken, not only South Africa, but every country on the continent in less than two weeks.  When I think of what FW de Klerk did by getting rid of all the generals and how he sold us down the river, I find it hard to feel peaceful.  My very soul demands that I speak out.  There was no such thing as the Swart Gewaar.  It was the Rooi Gewaar (Red danger) that needed to be eliminated, not the ANC.
I know that Cuba and Russia helped the ANC and that they may feel obliged to reciprocate, but not at the expense of ruining our land and taking away our freedom.  The people who really rule our land are the SACP.  They hide behind the ANC because it would be political suicide in world politics to have the hammer and sickle covering the ANC flag. 

The ANC promises and our wonderful Constitution are like toilet paper – to be used to cover the sh#t.  The ANC propaganda machine is trying to wrap up a fire in paper.  The injustices people suffer will demand an outlet, sooner or later. 

Tuesday, October 11, 2016

The Political Dirt on cannabis in South Africa.

Hemp (note heads) grown in SA on permit
Hemp picture of South Africa permit
Another warning on the glyphosate containers is “Notify all inhabitants in the immediate vicinity of the area to be sprayed and issue the necessary warnings.”  The communities in Eastern Cape were not warned that poisonous herbicides were going to be sprayed over their lands. The herbicide has scorched the earth of cannabis fields and neighbouring food crops as well.

In 1988, Dr Thandeka R Kunene founded the 100% black owned proudly South African company called House of Hemp.   In 2010, House of Hemp became the first private company to be awarded a 6 year exclusive permit from the Department of Agriculture and the Department of Health to legally cultivate and process hemp in South Africa. Their farms are at Misty Mount in Lebode, Qamata in Queenstown, Wellington in the Western Cape and in Nkumba Bulwer KwaZulu Natal.
To keep this under the radar, these farms have names such as Evergreen Cooperative, Rapula Farming, Qamata Irrigation Scheme and so on. 
Since these are registered areas, the police helicopters and their poisonous herbicides by-pass these farms. WTF?  Dr Thandeka R Kunene is the Coordinator of the National Hemp Foundation’s Private Sector Working group.
What they sell through Hemp for Africa are the following:
Cold-pressed oil from the seeds
Hemp De hulled seed (left after the pressing)
Protein Powder made from the whole seed
Hemp fabric
All these items are available in from Hemp 4 Africa.  I have no doubt that there are hundreds of uses for this plant.  It will keep the earth clean and it will be good for us.   You can email EugeneCeronio@gmail.com or call him on 076 162 1686.  The oil and seeds has many nutritional (we are not allowed to say medicinal because that is also illegal) properties, but you can get that info from emailing Eugene directly.
I want to know what they do with the rest of the plant.  What are they doing with the flowers or heads of the crop?   It is the flower or head of the crop that contains the cannabis oil because the oil glands are on the flower.  What are they doing with it?  Are they exporting it?  Or are they using it in some other devious plan.  And if they are only taking the seeds, how are they going to plant another crop?  I asked Eugene this question and he said that 10% of the seeds of a crop are held back for the next season.  I am not so sure.  There is an eerie relationship between the maker of the poison that is sprayed, Mansanto and the seeds, our government who have made cannabis illegal, the fact that there are farms producing it using pseudonyms to cover their tracks; and the cohesion between the 100% black company (remember that hemp and cannabis are the same thing) that are not sprayed because they are in restricted areas.  The sum total of all this is that the government (all black company) has made it legal for them to grow and distribute but illegal for the man in the street to possess or grow it.   There is something very wrong with this scenario.

It is reminiscent of my finding that while antiretroviral medication was being blamed by the Minister of Health and the President as being poisonous, we were making the medication and exporting it.  Hundreds of thousands of people died because they were denied medication.   Is this what is happening here again?  And the sheeple keep their blinkers on while the government steals from those who need it most?   The SAPS say they use a different poison called Kilo Max to spray marijuana fields, maintaining it poses no threat to human, animal or environmental health …. Aaaah!  Pull the other leg. 

Tuesday, May 27, 2014

The Death of a Dream

I am so tired. The tears sting my eyes as I struggle to open the padlock on the security door and then open the locked door while balancing the files of court documents in one arm and my bag in the other. How many times do I have to bend down and look a child in the eyes and say “I love you still”, and then prize their little arms from around my legs or waist while they are being pulled away from me by an abusive parent, a family member, a stranger or a social worker?

Another day in court. Another child I could not save. Another court case where the outcome was a fait accompli. The child’s fate was sealed before we even had a chance. I lock the doors behind me, put the kettle on, make a cup of coffee and flop down on the couch. The tears slowly flow down my cheeks and before I realize it I am howling. Great big sobs are forcing their way out from deep within my chest. I am struggling to breathe. I am drowning in my grief. 

My mind is numb. I cannot think coherently anymore. My thoughts are with the children that have been taken away and then with my pain and then fly to what my mother said. “Dianne, you are farting against thunder”. Perhaps she is right. No matter what I do, no matter how hard I try, no matter how much I love, I can’t seem to make the social workers or the Commissioner of Child Welfare understand that the interests of the children come first. And I hear my own voice howling in the emptiness and silence and wonder if that is really me. Have I become insane? Have I finally and truly lost it? Is this the moment that I give up and leave it all behind? 

I struggle to bring my breathing under control and to stop the hideous howling that is coming out of my mouth. I grab a tissue and wipe the snot and tears away and look at the horrible distorted face staring back at me from the mirror. The vision staring back at me makes me start crying all over again, and now I can’t stop. I lie down on the couch and bury my head in a pillow and sob until I fall asleep. I wake up hours later, cold and disorientated. 

And then I remember. 

I found nine year old Kelly one ice-cold winter’s night in May 2002 in Lusaka, a shanty township made up of dwellings built from corrugated iron, bits of wood, plastic, cardboard or anything that can serve as cover for the severe winters and summers. The township is adjacent to Middelburg, a Karoo town in the Eastern Cape, and is the oldest township in South Africa. 

Kelly was sitting with her seven year-old friend, Jane, in what would serve as a street, which is nothing more that a strip of gravel between dwellings. They had covered themselves with a piece of cardboard to keep themselves warm. Kelly was dressed in a tracksuit top that only reached her elbows and had on a pair of track pants that reached her knees. Jane had a school dress on. Neither girl had any underwear nor had they shoes. Kelly had a very large scar running along her face where she had been stabbed by a youth in the township when she had been gang raped. 

Both girls had lice and scabies. Both had been raped. Neither girl had had anything to eat in four days. Their last meal had been on the rubbish dump, the place known to the street children as “The Restaurant”. They had also never attended school. I reported the child abuse and rape to the police and a docket was opened. 

Within weeks of the arrival of the girls, they too settled in with the other children, and were clean, healthy, happy, and attending school. But, as with all children who have lived on the street and who have been subjected to such a cruel upbringing, it is not easy to adjust to living in a house with others and it is not easy for others who are now socialized to live with such children. Children who have lived on the street and who have been subjected to abuse do not know how to eat with a knife and fork nor to eat from a plate. They are used to scraping food from pots or plastic bags or off the street with their fingers. Kelly told me how she used to scrape the banana skins off the tar road after a car had ridden over them. 

They have never used a tooth brush or a toilet and have no idea of how to use toilet paper. They do not know how to blow their noses. They have to be taught how to get dressed, irrespective of their age, because they have never had any other clothes other than the ones they have on, so therefore have never had to take them off to put others on.

Bathing is a major problem and struggle, as they want to bathe or shower with their clothes on. They do not understand that they have their own shoes and cannot just wear anyone’s shoes, so this also causes consternation with the other children when new children come in. 

Children are renowned for teasing one another, but it is a tragedy that these children tease one another in this way: “The man that raped you was a grandfather but the one that raped me was young”. It soon came to our notice that Kelly, Lindelwa and Evelyn, three of our young children, had all been raped by the same man. This man is still walking around in the town, despite it being reported to the police and dockets being opened for all three offences. In the case of Evelyn, three male police came to take the statement from her. 

She told her story up until the point of the rape and then she refused to continue speaking. I then requested the police to send a female detective to take her statement. No female detective was ever sent. In the case of Kelly, no detective ever came to take a statement; and in the case of Lindelwa, she told her entire story to all three male detectives, which I thought was very brave for an eleven year-old girl. She also mentioned the name of her rapist as well as the address at which he stayed. The dockets went to the Public Prosecutor but he refused to prosecute. 

When I requested reasons for refusal to prosecute, it was stated that there was insufficient evidence, and that the problem had been socially taken care of since the children were now in my care. I have written to the Head of Public Prosecutions requesting an investigation into the reasons why it was thought there was insufficient evidence. Surely the police investigated the cases thoroughly, since rape is a serious offence and three children identified the same man as the rapist? 

The children also play-act their rapes and sodomies for months after coming into care. Often, too, the children will use sticks or toothbrush ends to stick into their vaginas and anuses to show one another what has been done to them. It takes a lot of patience and counselling to get the children past their sex games and to the point where they realize that what has been done to them is not normal living. 

As time passed, Kelly and Jane became more and more settled in and socialized with the large family that we had become. They were happy and carefree children. 

One late afternoon in August 2002, a little squint-eyed boy who I had often seen with a group of street boys came to see me. He told me that he wanted to come and live with me. “Mama D”, he said, “I am tired of living on the street and since you are looking after my sister, it is my right to live with you”. It turned out that his sister was Kelly. The little boy was 10 year old Shaun, or Gigi, as he was known in the township. Shaun was on the Department of Social Development Register so I made the necessary enquiries and was told that there was no problem with the child living with me. 

By the time Shaun came to live with us, there were thirty-four of us. Shaun was clever, witty, smart and loveable. He was also a talented gumboot dancer. The gumboot dance is the dance that the men on the mines in South Africa dance. And I fell in love with Shaun instantly. He always came up with the most amazing things. One day he stroked my arms and said, “I love the fat on these arms, because these are the arms that are growing me”. Shaun lived life with abandon. And I sent him to school as well. 

I remember how Kelly grew from the frightened, abandoned, emotionally damaged child she was to the confident and child she became, the child with courage, determination and the beautiful smile. I remember the pranks and the compassion that Shaun showed at all times, the spirit of survival that he showed, his enthusiasm for life. I remembered the laughter, the love and the joy of our family being together and the security we all shared in being together. And I remembered with disbelief the telephone call I received yesterday the Social Worker, Pumza Mobo, to tell me that I was to bring Kelly and Shaun to the Magistrate’s Court because their aunt was going to foster the children. I relive it in my mind. 

“What aunt?”, I ask. 

“Their mother’s cousin’s sister”, she said. 

“Have you investigated and done the report?”, I asked. 

“Yes”. 

“What are the circumstances?”, I asked. 

“She lives alone and is willing to care for the children”, she tells me. 

“But where has this aunt been for the past three years?”, I ask. 

Silence. 

“Be at court at 7h45”, the social worker tells me, “and don’t forget to bring the children”. 

The time is 16h30. The offices of the Department of Social Development close at 16h30. I have no time to argue the case or do anything about what is going to happen. Pumza Mobo has timed this perfectly to her advantage. 

I go down to the children’s house. I call Kelly and Shaun and tell them that we have to go to court tomorrow and that their aunt wants them to go and live with her. I ask them if they are happy about that. They are not. They say they will go for the weekend but not forever. I tell them that family is better than staying in a children’s home forever, but I will try and speak to the magistrate to get him to let them stay a while longer or let them come home to me for weekends. I try and get them prepared in case things do not go according to what they want, and for that matter, according to what I want. 

The Department of Social Development has a mandate that all children are to be re-unified with family as soon as possible after being removed from their home. In Kelly and Shaun’s case, they were not removed from their home, but from the street. Re-unification also means that the child or children are given a period of adjustment, so that they get used to their new family circumstances and that there is as little trauma associated with the move to their new environment as possible. 

We are at court at 7h45. Kelly and Shaun are holding tightly onto my hands. The social worker and Trudie, the nursery school teacher, are there. I look around for someone else. I ask the social worker where the aunt is. She points to Trudie. I gasp. I am shocked. I cannot believe what I am seeing or hearing. Something cannot be right. Every day I see Trudie. She has not mentioned that she is the aunt of the children. She has never visited the children. The children have not mentioned her, nor have they ever made any fuss of her. What is going on here? 


“What is going on here, Trudie?”, I ask. 

“If you wanted the children, why did you not discuss it with me?”, I question her. 

“Pumza told me to take the children and I assumed you knew about it”, she said, indicating the social worker. 

Just then, we are called into the court room. 

The magistrate, who now assumes the position of Commissioner of Child Welfare, looks at all the papers, asks the “aunt” if she is willing to take the children, then asks the social worker if she is happy and when he gets the affirmative starts making out the order. I attempt to make myself heard by telling the Commissioner that the children have been with me for three years, that they need a period of adjustment before the final move, and that I have not been given a chance to see the report. He tells me that children need to be with 
their families and that is all that matters. With that, the order is signed and we are dismissed. I am shocked. Thoughts run through my head. I want to shout out loud that it is all a set up. That if the social worker was not sleeping with the Commissioner of Child Welfare, maybe the children’s rights would be observed!!!! In whose interest was the order made out? We walk out and the children cling to me. I ask the aunt to please let the children visit and then she and the social worker start pulling them away from me and put them into the social worker’s car. I stand on the court house steps and watch the car drive away, the children’s faces awash with tears, pressed up against the windows of the car. 

I get up and wash my face. I am no longer so cold and disorientated. I have had a cup of coffee but I need to talk. I need to be with other human beings who care. I need to talk to Nonqaba. I put on a jacket and walk down the road. Three houses of children in the same street, but this evening the sound is muted. There is a sadness hanging over all the homes. Shaun and Kelly are gone. I remember overhearing Shaun telling some of the other children one day, “Life is better when she is around”, pointing over his shoulder at me. They were part of the family. I must remember to tell the children that although these two are gone, they are not dead, not like the others. 

I fall into Nonqaba’s arms. I can see she has been crying too. But her tears are of anger. 

“That woman is not the children’s aunt! And she has already got 8 children that she is fostering. She only does this to get the foster-care money”, said Nonqaba, clearly angry and agitated. 


“I am going to see that Pumza Mobo, she is a liar. I don’t know what she is trying to do with this community”, she continued. 

The situation regarding the two children was worse than I thought. Not only were they suddenly uprooted from a place where they were safe and happy with no preparation for the move, but now they were in a place where they were not with family as they were led to believe, but with a group of children. Kelly is now living in the same township where her rapist is still walking free. The interest of the child was clearly not a priority. 

The priority was foster-care grant for the foster mother, and an easy solution for the social worker whose mandate was to ensure that as many children were removed from my care as possible, regardless of where and how they are placed. Section 28 (2) of the Constitution states: A child’s best interests are of paramount importance in every matter concerning the child. 

What does this really mean to the child? It may as well not exist as far as the child is concerned, because in this case the child’s interests were clearly not taken into consideration and, in fact, the children’s rights were violated according to the constitution.

Nonqaba and I put the children to bed and when all was quiet, made a cup of tea and sat at the kitchen table, talking about the problems caused by the authorities. Why, when the authorities had no alternative to us, did they give us such a hard time? Why did they not want to assist us with what we were doing? Why would they not work with us? After all, these children belonged to all of us. They were the thrown away children of the community. 

We did not receive any grants for them. We did not take anything from the authorities. We were no threat to the social workers. Or were we? Were we showing them up by doing what we were doing? Were we doing what they were being paid to do and they were not doing it? Was it professional jealousy? We had tried attracting the bees with the honey. It had not worked. We were now standing up to them. We were studying the Child Care Act and the Constitution and using those when dealing with them, but even that did not always work. They would catch us off guard, like they did with Kelly and Shaun. 

We had another problem. Shaun was part of the drama performance we were taking to the Grahamstown National Arts Festival. We had been practicing for weeks and the gumboot dancers’ performance was excellent. Their precision and synchronization was unbelievable for children of their age, and Shaun was an integral part of the performance. The venue had been booked and paid for, the accommodation had been booked and paid for, the advertising had been done and above all, Shaun was looking forward to the ten days of performing in Grahamstown. Now we would have to look at the whole play and try and get the boys to perform without one of the team. 

The welfare knew that Shaun was part of the team and that we were going to Grahamstown. No one from Middelburg had ever performed at the Grahamstown National Arts Festival before, and this was a really big event in all our lives. We were going to be performing against seven hundred other professional performances. How could that social worker do this to us, and more specifically, to Shaun? Did she not have any compassion, any vision, any thought for the future of the children? 

I left Nonqaba to go to bed, hoping that a new day would bring a new perspective on everything. I did not have the energy to bath. I just lay on the bed. Despair was the only thing I felt. Total despair. Total exhaustion. Not depression. 

Despair. Depression is a sadness, one you can speak about, a condition that can be treated with medication. Despair is a dark pit in the mind from which there is no escape, no words to describe and no medication to relieve. No place to go. No way to turn. No way out. I think of death. I feel I cannot carry on. There seems no reason to take the children in, protect them, love them and to let them go the way Shaun and Kelly left today. I know what will happen to them. They will stop going to school. They will return to the streets. The foster care grant will be misused. It has happened hundreds of times before. What help did I really give to Kelly and Shaun? Would it not have been better to leave them on the street, because then they would have known no better? Perhaps they would have been dead, but now they were suffering indescribable heartache, the wrench from the safety of our home, the love, the security. What had I really achieved by taking them in for three years and loving them the way I had? I think of taking an overdose. But I don’t have the energy to get off the bed. I hope God will be kind enough not to let me wake up tomorrow.

(Extract from Saving Mandela’s Children by Dianne Lang - available on Amazon and Kindle) 

Tuesday, April 8, 2014

The Russians, The Boers And My Ignorance

Anglo Boer War 
How ignorant and how skewed can one’s view of the world become through socialisation and the media.  I was shocked to my core after reading a number of books on communism and the Red Danger (as it was known in South Africa) to find that the Russians actually came to the assistance of the white South Africans during the Anglo-Boer War.   Although I had studied Marx, Engels and Lenin, their communism and socialism certainly did not tally with the awfulness of Stalin and Mao’s communism, or the communism that the National Party was so determined to keep out of South Africa’s borders. 
Why did I never think further than my nose?  I knew about the horror of living under Stalin’s rule and I knew about the Soviet ties with the ANC and the South African Communist Party.  I knew that cadres were being trained in Cuba and in other communist countries and that they were coming over our borders to disrupt the Nationalist government.   I knew that the children were fed up with being forced to study in Afrikaans and were burning the schools; I knew that Winnie Mandela was going to set the country alight with her matches and her tyres.  And I knew that the communist countries were helping the ANC.   I also knew that no one had the right to tell anyone else that they could or could not do something based on the colour of their skin.  This I also understood was wrong.  And while I supported the ‘struggle’ for equal rights, I was convinced that if the communists took over we would be in big shit.   At the time, I did not know about the alliance between the SACP and the ANC.  I only knew about the PAC and the ANC.  The very thought of the SACP did not even enter my head. Surely, if the National Party would give everyone equal rights, they would ensure that the communists stayed out of it.  Well, that was my belief.   I never once wondered why the communists would want to help the ANC.
Now that I am mature (I don’t like to say old), I have been reading and researching as much as I can about communism, what it was like to live under the rule of communism and how communism eventually fell away.   I am trying to understand that if history has shown how abusive communism is to human rights, why are we  still be so involved  and tolerant of the SACP?   I am trying to understand how it is possible that group rights (communism) are more important than individual rights?   I am trying to understand if it is at all possible for individual and groups rights to co-exist.   I personally think that it is mutually exclusive and cannot co-exist so that groups and individuals have rights.  If group rights are emphasised, then individual rights are abused and vice versa.
I digress … Russian politics has been muddled up with South African politics for much longer than most of us realize.   I did not know that Russia (under the Tsar) sent the Russian Red Cross to the aid of the Boers during the Anglo Boer War, nor did I know that Russian volunteers, and one in particular, played such a large role in helping the Boers fight against the English.   In fact, the Anglo-Boer War was the starting point of direct relations between the two countries.   There are political parallels between the Soviet ties to the ANC and the SACP and the help that Russia sent to the Boers.  The second would not have taken place without the foundation that was laid by the first. The fierce anti-communism of the apartheid government has made it difficult for South Africans to associate with Russians, or even to admit association in the distant part.   It is my opinion that the demise of both communist Russia and apartheid South Africa has been a blessing.  Both political standpoints were barbaric in every sense.
One of the most remarkable Russians who came to the aid of the Boers, first as a Russian war correspondent from the Russian paper Novoie Vremia who swopped his pen for a revolver, was the Deputy Commander of the foreign volunteers, Colonel Maximov.  A Belgium nurse, Alice Bron, wrote about Maximoff during those days in May 1900.  People get to know one another very quickly when in close contact during war.   “…He was brave even to rashness, as all his men told me, while he delighted in relating incidents which showed the indomitable bravery of his Dutch followers…At one point the colonel ordered his men to attack a position. They hesitated; thinking that the attempt was sure to fail.  The colonel, exclaiming, “You’ll see I am right,” dashed forward, and his men followed him.  The colonel was wounded in the foot, shoulder ear and temple.   The temple wound dropped the colonel and his men gathered around him, opening fire to protect him.  This incident shows the bravery of both officer and his men.  (Davidson, A and Filatova I, The Russians and the Anglo-Boer War, 1998, p68).
After the death of Commander Villebois, President Steyn appointed Maximov commander of the European Legion.   His greatest battle was that of Thaba Nchu where he shot the English Captain Towse at almost point blank range.  He lost only two men, while he was one of five seriously wounded.  Maximov was taken to Kroonstad where Nurse Alic Bron found him on 12 May, 1900, just hours before the British troops entered town.  The day before, he had ridden (wounded) to Pretoria and spent the day with President Steyn.  When he returned to Kroonstad the Boers had already left town and blown up the bridge.  The nurse tried to persuade Maximov to leave.  He relates his argument against leaving as such; “Never, never have I run away from an enemy.”   They eventually left Kroonstad, with the colonel on horseback while his secretary, “boy” and nurse rode in a kind of dog-cart.   She described him as bold as a lion but as obstinate as a mule.
After Thaba Nchu, De Volkstem wrote that he was a very brave officer and had faced the enemy at twenty paces.  When it was found that his wounds were too severe (fractured skull) for him to continue to act as veggeneraal, Maximov proposed that the command be handed over to P Blignaut, son of the state secretary of the Republic of the Orange Free State.    The official handing over was held on the 22 May 1900 in the Hollandia Hotel in Pretoria.
Maximov attended the last session of the Transvaal Volksraad before he returned to Russia.  President Kruger and General Smuts personally thanked him for his services to their country and for the blood he had shed in its defence.
The Russian public saw the Boer struggle against the British as a battle between David and Goliath.  The pro-Boer sentiment weakened Britain and also served domestic interests by distracting public attention away from the social and political inequalities at home.   Perhaps the most important reason for the Russian pro-Boer attitude was the growing gold-mining industry.  The Russians would have been interested in the methods and know-how of the Transvaal gold miners for their own newly born gold-mining industry of Siberia and the Ural Mountains.    The increasing Jewish emigration from Russia to the Transvaal also provided a further reason for Russia to establish close ties with South Africa.  Even though the Jews were fleeing due to political pogroms, the Russians were quick to turn this to their advantage by realizing the advantages of having Russian speaking people in South Africa.  This served as a network between Russia and South Africa, along which flowed money, people and information.
I doubt that many South Africans even know about the involvement of Russia in helping the Boers, let alone the unbelievable bravery of Colonel Maximov.   In Russia, Maximov is almost completely forgotten.  Even his grave in Manchuria is forgotten.  Such insignificance is given to a particular Russian individual’s fate because the ordeals of Russia’s people have been so terrible during this century that those who lived either did not care or were too afraid to care about the memory of so many of the dead.  If Maximov had belonged to another nation, his heroism would have been celebrated with pride.
Perhaps the underlying involvement of the Communist Soviet state with the ANC and the SACP was nothing more than a way in which to take control over South Africa’s enormous environmental wealth and the “equal rights struggle” just a means to that end.