Wednesday, February 25, 2015

Our songs of “kill the boer” and “fokken swartes” are louder than Nkosi Sikelel' iAfrika.

We all flaunt the words “Capitalism, Communism, Fascism, and Socialism” as though we know what we are talking about.  But do we?   What is the definition of Capitalism, Communism, Fascism, and Socialism?  Are these concepts taught to the people at political rally’s or conferences?  Does the South African population even know what they are talking about when they say they belong to this or that political party?  Do they even know what the mandate of their chosen political party is? 

“Pay back the money…give us back our land…nationalise everything… blame it on apartheid…BEEE…AA…whites that…blacks this…kill the boer…fokken swartes…”are the calls from all the lunatic fringe groups but they sing the loudest song. 
The only way that we can teach these lunatics is to educate them politically and by teaching them to think for themselves, instead of blindly following political leaders whose propaganda is merely to increase their personal love for power and money, irrespective of who they hurt and damage in the process.    The most obvious problem in South Africa is the inability of the masses to think rationally and independently.  If each person could be given a chance to negotiate a rational and clearly thought political or world view, the lunatics and their lunatic leaders would be silenced.   At the very least, knowing what these terms mean, may assist people in debating politics rationally.  Political immaturity provokes emotional outbursts and race hate in this country.  

There are pitfalls in trying to simplify the definitions of capitalism, socialism, communism and fascism.  These concepts are complex because they involve not only government, but economics as well.  Another problem is that they are not mutually exclusive and finally, different times in history, the terms have been defined differently. 
Some of the terms refer only to economic systems (capitalism) while others refer to government and economic systems (communism and fascism).
 The United States is a Constitutional Democratic Republic that has long embraced both capitalism (free markets) and socialism (public schools and universities, and public works – parks, roads and highways, sewer and water, dams, harbours and social welfare.
Capitalism is an economic system in which all or most of the means of production are privately owned, operated and the investment of capital, production, distribution and prices are determined mainly by a free market and not by the state.  The means of production are operated for profit.
In a purely capitalist economy, there would be no public schools, no state owned or maintained roads and highways, public works, welfare, unemployment insurance, workers compensation or social security.
Socialism refers to state ownership of common property or state ownership of the means of production.   In a purely socialist state, individuals would own nothing, not even their labour.
However, almost all modern capitalist countries combine socialism and capitalism.
Communism refers to community ownership of property with the end goal of being complete social equality via economic equality.   It is generally seen by communist countries as an idealized utopian economic and social state that the country as a whole is working toward.  Such an ideal often justifies means using means that are authoritarian or totalitarian that is not communist ideals.  Therefore, to attain pure communism, it necessitates the violation of individual rights over the rights of the group. 
Basically, communism states that all labour belongs to the individual labourer, no man can own another man’s body and therefore each man owns his own labour.  All profit belongs in part to the labourer and not those in control of the business or the business owner.  Profit that is not shared is fundamentally tyrannical.
Fascism comes from the Latin word, “fasces”, meaning the bundle of sticks used by the Romans that symbolized their empire.  Hence, Fascism attempts to return the glory and social organisation of Rome to the land by a system led by a dictator who has complete power, who forcibly suppresses opposition, regiments all commerce and highlights aggressive nationalism and racism.   Fascism is almost the complete opposite to communism because it is opposed to state ownership and economic equality is not a goal.  All actions should not be motivated by economic motives and democracy is repudiated. Hitler justified dictatorship and Nazi anti-Semitism on the basis of fighting communism!  The churches also played a major role in the European fascist countries because they were opposed to the threat of godless communists.  

Capitalism and socialism refer simply to economic systems. They are amoral systems.  Communism and fascism refer to economics, governance and basic moral principles. They imply a total ideology, a morality (good or bad morals are dictated), an economy and a government.

Utilitarianism is my preferred political stance, although it too has its limitations.  Utilitarianism is a theory that holds the course of action must be the one that maximizes utility for the total benefit of man while reducing suffering.  It is an economic analysis that is human-centred and based on a moral foundation.  Actions are right if they are useful or benefit the majority of people (irrespective of various classifications).  The greatest happiness for the greatest number should be the guiding principle of conduct.  However, the problem with utilitarianism is that it focuses on the consequences of an action rather than the motive.  In addition, it does not adequately compare the happiness of different individuals and fails to account for the value placed on justice and equality.
That being said – I am sure that these are not insurmountable problems.  We can blaze our own path here in South Africa.  We do not need to follow long-dead theorists where the theory did not work in practice.


Perhaps it is time to re-read Plato’s The Republic

0 comments: