Wednesday, November 28, 2018

Strange Evidence collection in Heinrich van Rooyen's trial

I am in possession of the court records of Heinrich van Rooyen, accused and found guilty of the murder of two girls in Knysna in 2005. In an affidavit used in court by Inspector Jullies - he collected evidence samples for the forensic laboratory he states that on 15/11/2005 he found hair and a black elastic band at the crime scene of Victoria Stadler and then FOUR DAYS LATER, on 19/11/2005 he found a pair of panties and a pair of ladies long pants AT THE SAME crime scene? He found something so small on the 15th but missed the large items and only found them four days later?? And the panties and long pants were lying THREE metres from where the body of Victoria had been lying.

Now look at this: On the 17/11/2005, Heinrich van Rooyen was arrested as a suspect for both murders. On the instruction from Trollip, Heinie’s blood was drawn “for DNA testing”. He was released on the 19^th.

Did Trollip contaminate the pair of panties and the pair of ladies long pants with Heini’s DNA and then place them at the crime scene so that it could be found FOUR DAYS AFTER the crime scene was investigated and on the day Heini was released?

Another strange situation is that Peter McHelm and Victoria Stadler were booked on the same docket as having gone missing on the same day. McHelm’s body and that of Victoria were found in the same vicinity. How could Trollip separate the two crimes and let one Kamoeti and Moses go to prison for McHelm’s murder but pin the murder of Victoria on Heini? Kamoeti tried to take an author to court for having used his name in his book (calling him a murderer, which he was) but Moses wrote an affidavit confirming their involvement in the murder of Victoria. It was thrown out of court and Moses was poisoned a short while later. One does not have to be a rocket scientist to realize who orchestrated the murder of Moses.