RESPONSE TO HERALD EDITORIAL 11/7/2014
Editorial Comment in Herald today |
Dear Editor
I refer to
your Editorial Comment in the Herald on 11 July 2014, as well as the article on
the front page written by Sipho Masombuka, Nomahlubi Jordaan and Thulani
Gqirana.
The front
page article refers to Peggy Calata, the sister of Fort Calata, who stated that
if Eugene de Kock is given parole, revenge would be taken by the affected
families, and that “he would not live long on the outside”. This is a direct threat to kill someone, and
printed on the front page of a newspaper. Surely our country has moved a little further
along in reconciliation and forgiveness of the atrocities of the past, that we
have no need to quote hate speech and threats to the life of another?
I am also
rather alarmed by your own editorial comment in which you question whether ‘this
man’, as you put it, “can be truly remorseful of his actions?” It is quite clear that you are not in
possession of all the facts in this case.
It is disappointing that an Editor of a large circulation newspaper such
as the Herald, is so ignorant of the facts.
You refer to Justice Minister, Michael Masutha, who told a press
conference that the government needed time to consult the families of De Kock’s
victims before deciding whether to let him go. I would like to know just how much time you
think the government needs to consult with the victims? The parole process has been going on for
years. And with regard to your question
of remorse …de Kock has asked forgiveness from family members of victims, he
pleaded guilty, he helped the TRC, he continues to assist the National
Prosecuting Authorities, he has told the truth …what more can a person do to
show remorse?
At the conclusion of his appearance
before the TRC, Eugene de Kock asked if he could meet with the widows of the
victims of the Motherwell bombing. The
widows’ lawyer agreed. Pumla
Gobodo-Madikizela spoke to the widows during a weekend of debriefing. “I was profoundly touched by him”, Mrs Faku
said of her encounter with de Kock. Both
women felt that de Kock had communicated to them something he felt deeply and
had acknowledged their pain. “I couldn’t control my tears. I could hear him, but I was overwhelmed by
emotion, and I was just nodding, as a way of saying yes, I forgive you. I hope that when he sees our tears, he knows
that they are not only tears for our husbands, but tears for him as well … I
would like to hold him by the hand, and show him that there is a future, and
that he can still change”. (A human being died that night, page 14) If the
widows of men killed by Eugene de Kock can forgive him, then we, the people of
South Africa, should welcome his release, whether through parole or Presidential
Pardon.
South Africa has seen the impossible
become possible. It was said that the
release of Nelson Mandela from prison was impossible; that the apartheid
National Party would never free a prisoner convicted for treason. The impossible happened and he became
President. Because our South African
past has shown us that anything is possible, I urge everyone to close the door
on the hatred of yesterday and open the door on true reconciliation and
forgiveness today…then our tomorrow has a rosier future.
Who amongst us can cast a
stone? How can we have reconciliation while
one man is kept in prison for all the crimes committed by so many people? Was Eugene de Kock’s crimes any worse than
the thousands upon thousands of people who fought for and against the National
Party? Was he the unfortunate scape-goat
so that others could walk free? Is this
the reason he was tried and incarcerated as an ordinary prisoner? Was it because charging him as a common
criminal would ensure that someone was incarcerated, and could take the blame
for all the wrongs of the previous government?
The crimes that Eugene de Kock committed were as a direct result of his
employment by the National Party. There
are many, many people from all sides of the “war” that committed similar crimes
for which prisoner number 94616105 still languishes in prison for. What kind of justice do we have in this
country when only one person is charged for a crime committed by many?
A man who takes away another man’s
freedom is a prisoner of hatred.
(Nelson Mandela) I do not, nor
will I ever believe, that the people of South Africa are prisoners of hatred.
For the love of justice, compassion,
forgiveness and for reconciliation of our land, I beg all South Africans to
move away from hate and revenge.
0 comments:
Post a Comment